Reinderman, Dimitri - Timman, Jan H
Lost Boys Amsterdam (Amsterdam), 1999
Notes by Michael Jensen
C33. 1.e4 e5
2.f4 exf4
3.Bc4 Before this tournament
Reindermann had exclusively played 3.Nf3, and even though he lost with it in the first round to Sokolov
(who replied 3...Ne7) he gives Bc4 another go. Timman is no stranger to the King's Gambit, having published
the 'Open Games' CD for New In Chess. Nf6
[3...c6 4.Nc3
Nf6 But Black can also try
(4...d5!? 5.exd5
Qh4+ 6.Kf1
f3 which was seen in Ivanchuk-Piket,
Linares 1997.)]
4.Nc3! The alternatives are
quickly dismissed:
[4.Qe2 Lopez. Bc5! [E/G]]
[4.e5? d5
5.Bb3
(5.Bb5+ Bd7)
5...Ne4 6.Nf3
Bg4 7.
Anderssen
- Morphy, Paris 1858 .]
[4.Qf3 Nc6
5.Qxf4 d5
6.exd5 Nxd5
7.Qe4+ Be6
8.Nc3 Nf6
9.Qe3 Ng4
10.Qe4 Qd4! [E/G]]
[4.d3!? has been used with success
by the Polgar sisters, but it only promises equality.]
4...c6! # Discovered by Jaenisch
in the middle of the 19th century. Black intends to strike in the centre with d7-d5, hitting the Bishop
on c4. This plan is very similar to the Paulsen defence to the Bishop's opening: 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 4.d3
c6 which is very comfortable for Black.
[4...Bb4!? is another variation
on our theme of Nf6/Bb4, and should superficially speaking be worse since White has not moved his d-pawn
yet, which means that there is not pin with Nf6-e4. We examine this idea later.]
5.Bb3! Another try is
[5.d4 is the main alternative,
which we examine in detail below.]
[5.Qf3 one example: d5
6.exd5 Bd6
7.Qe2+ others are worse. Be7
8.d6! Qxd6
9.d3
[5.Qe2 d5
6.exd5+ Be7
7.d6! transposes to 5.Qf3.]
5...d5 6.exd5
cxd5 Exchanging a pair of
knights with
[6...Nxd5 is less good. 7.Nxd5
cxd5 8.d4
Qh4+ 9.Kf1
Be6 10.Nf3
Qh5 11.Qe2
Tartakover.]
[6...Bd6 is similar to the
Nimzovich defence , and often transposes to the main lines, since White will simply decline the 'gift'. 7.Nf3
(7.d4 cxd5)
(7.Qe2+ is also possible,
one example: Be7 8.d4
Alekhine's
gun is hard to argue with. g5 26.Bxg5!
Kf7 27.Bh6
Ke6 28.Rg7
Qe8 29.Rxb7
Bg4 30.h3
Bf5 31.Rb6+
Kd7 32.Qg7+
Re7 33.Rb7+
Ke6 34.Re1+
Be4 35.Rxe4+
dxe4 36.d5+
Kd6 37.Qxf6+ 1-0
Tebb,D-Littlewood,P/Birmingham ENG 2000)
7...cxd5
(7...
8.d4 and we have transposed
to the main line.]
7.d4 Bd6 The
current (2001) main line of the Bishop's gambit. Black wants to take the money and run. White's problem
is that both his bishops are locked out of the game and he is still the gambit pawn down. This is an
important moment since White should select his strategy here. He has the choice between: 1) Trying to
regain the pawn as soon as possible with Nge2 or Qf3. 2) Developing with Nf3 and 0-0 followed by Ne5
when Pf4 might be won anyway. I am recommending that the reader follow plan 2, but in this game we look
at the consequences of opening door #1.
[7...Bb4!? which is examined
in Westerinen - Raetsky.]
[7...Be7 is extremely passive.]
8.Nge2 The more conventional-looking
[8.Nf3 which I recommend is
examined later.]
[8.Qf3 is seen in Lagumina
- Ernst.]
[8.Qe2+?! Has also been tried,
but it seems rather dubious. Be6 9.Nf3
8...f3!? The immediate
[8...
[8...Bg4 9.Qd3
(9.
The
position is about equal. Both sides have bad pawn-structures. White has a wrecked king position, but
his pieces are better placed. White would like to play Nc3-somewhere, c2-c3 and Bc2 when Black's King
will be in peril at g8. Black should probably prevent this with Nc6-a5xb3. In fact, Black might have
some difficulty finding a safe haven for his King, as there is also a nasty pin with Bg5.) 11...h6
12.Bxf6 Qxf6
13.Nb5 (13.f4 was
worth a try.) 13...Qd8 14.Nxd6+
Qxd6 15.Qd3
Nc6 16.c3
9...
(10.Bxf4 Bxe2
11.Nxe2 Bxf4
12.Nxf4 Re8+
13.Kf2 Qd6
14.g3 g5
15.Nh3 Ne4+
16.Kg2 Nc6
17.Rhf1 a5
18.c3 Re7?
19.Rf5!
Qg6 20.Rxd5
h6 21.Rf1
Rae8 22.Nf2
Nxf2 23.Qxg6+
fxg6 24.Rxf2
Kg7 25.Ba4
Re1 26.Bxc6
bxc6 27.Rxa5
Ra1 28.Ra7+
Kg8 29.Rc7
g4 30.Rxc6
Kg7 31.Rc7+
Kg8 32.Rcf7
h5 33.a3
Rb1 34.h3
Ree1 35.Rf8+ 1-0
Menyhart,T-Hegedus,G/Debrecen-ch 1995)
10...f3 11.gxf3
Bh3
(11...Be6 transposes to 9.0-0
f3)
12.Rf2 Nh5 The
Black 'attack' looks menacing but that is all. Now White will win a pawn, gain central control, and defend
easily. 13.Bxd5 Nc6
14.Bxc6 bxc6
15.Ne4
Bf5 16.Qc3
Rc8 17.Bg5
f6 18.Bh4
Qd7 19.Bg3
Be7 20.Rd1
Rfd8 21.Qb3+
Be6 22.Qe3
Re8 23.Qd2
Rcd8 24.Qa5
Nxg3 25.hxg3
Bd5 26.Qd2
Qb7 27.Qc1
c5 28.Nxc5
Bxc5 29.dxc5
Bxf3 30.Rxd8
Rxd8 31.Nc3
Qc6 32.Qf4
Bh5 33.b4
a5 34.a3
axb4 35.axb4
Bg6 36.Qc4+
Bf7 37.Qe2
Re8 38.Qf3
Re1+ 39.Kh2
Qe6 40.Re2
Rxe2+ 41.Qxe2
Qf5 42.Qe4
Qf2+ 43.Qg2
Qe3 44.Ne2
Bh5 45.Qa8+
Be8 46.Qd5+
Bf7 47.Qd8+
Be8 48.Nf4
g5 49.Ng2
Qe2 50.c6
Kg7 51.b5
Bg6 52.Qd7+
Kh6 53.c7
Be4 54.Qh3+
Kg6 55.c8=Q
h5 56.Qe8+
Kh6 57.g4
h4 58.Qe7
Kg6 59.Qxe4+
Qxe4 60.Qd3 1-0
Knazovcik,L-Rybak,M/CZE 1993]
[8...g5 can be met by 9.h4 or
maybe
(9.
9...f3 10.gxf3
g4 11.Bg5
gxf3 12.Nxd5
Be7 13.Nec3
Nxd5 14.Bxd5
Bxg5 15.hxg5
Qxg5 16.Qxf3
Bg4 17.Qg3
Nd7 18.
9.gxf3 Be6 It
is surprising that the natural
[9...Nh5!? prevents the pin
on g5 and the move Bf4 in one go, making it much more difficult for White to develop and castle queenside. 10.
[9...
(10...Be6 11.Qd2
Be7 12.
11.Bh4 Be7
12.Qd3 Nc6
13.
[9...Bh3?! 10.Nf4
Bf5
(10...Bxf4 yields the Bishop
pair but would have been the lesser evil. 11.Bxf4
)
11.Qe2+ Kd7
12.Qb5+ Kc8
13.Ncxd5
Nxd5 14.Bxd5
Qe8+ 15.Qxe8+
Rxe8+ 16.Kf2
Bxc2 17.Bxf7
Rf8 18.Be6+
Nd7 19.Bd2
Kd8 20.Rac1
Rc8 21.Nh5
g6 22.Ng3
Rc7 23.Rhe1
Be7 24.Bh6
Rf6 25.Bg7
Rf4 26.Bxd7
Kxd7 27.Be5
Bd6 28.Bxf4
Bxf4 29.Ne4
Bxc1 30.Rxc1
b6 31.Nc5+
bxc5 32.Rxc2
cxd4 33.Rxc7+
Kxc7 34.Ke2
Kd6 35.Kd3
Kc5 36.a3
a6 37.f4
h6 38.b4+
Kb5 39.Kxd4
Ka4 40.Ke5
Kxa3 41.Kf6
Kxb4 42.Kxg6 1-0
Narings,N-Van Beers,E/NLD-chT9596 1995]
[9...Nc6 has seen so little
action 10.Rg1
10.Bg5 # In this position
White is a tempo down on the line 8...Bg4 9.0-0 f3 10.gxf3 Be6 11.Bg5 since Black's Bishop took only
one move to get to e6. However since that tempo was 0-0, White now has the option of castling queenside
as indeed he does.
[10.Bf4 Bb4
11.a3 Bxc3+
12.Nxc3 Nbd7
13.Qd2 a6
14.Rg1 g6
15.
10...h6 11.Bh4
[11.Bxf6 would only help Black.]
11...g5 12.Bg3
Nc6 13.Qd2
Ne7 14.
#
White is trying to sneak in through the backdoor to finish off the Black King.
[19.Nxd5 Nxd5
20.Bxd5 Bxd5
21.Nxf5 f6 is
much more unclear.]
19...Rfc8 20.Bxf6
Bxf6 21.hxg4
Nxg3 22.Qxg3
Qd6 23.Qf3
Rxc3 A desperate counter-attack. 24.bxc3
a5 25.f5
Qa3+ 26.Kd2
Bg5+ 27.Kd3
Rf8 28.fxe6
fxe6 29.Qg2 The
rest of the moves were Qd6 30.Ke2
a4 31.Rhf1
Rc8 32.Rf3
axb3 33.axb3
Ra8 34.Kf1
Ra2 35.Kg1
e5 36.dxe5
Qxe5 37.Qf2
Qe6 38.Kh1
Ra8 39.Qd4
Rd8 40.Rf5
Qe2 41.Rf2
Qe6 42.Rf3
Qe2 43.Qd3
Qe8 44.Rdf1
Qe4 45.Qxe4
dxe4 46.R3f2
e3 47.Re2
Kg7 48.Rf5
Rd6 49.Rb5
b6 50.Kg2
Rf6 51.c4
Rc6 52.Kf3
Kg6 53.Ke4
Rf6 54.Rf5
Rc6 55.Rd5
Rf6 56.Kd3
Re6 57.c5
bxc5 58.Rxc5
Rd6+ 59.Ke4
Rd1 60.Rc6+
Kf7 61.Rxe3! With
the Black King cut off at the back the rook-endgame is easily winning. I actually feel a little bad now,
since this is the second game in this series with Jan Timman at the receiving end. 8...f3 seems a bit
dubious, but it is surprising that 9. ..Nh5 has not been tried more often.
1-0